5 Comments
User's avatar
Rebecca Sinclair's avatar

Thanks so much Lynda. I have been so frustrated with the kōrero around this, and suspicious about the science of learning, given its focus on such a narrow aspect of our cognition (primarily memory). I’m especially suspicious about the alignment with a narrowing of our curriculum towards abstract “biologically secondary” knowledge that casts other ways of knowing as “folk science”. It would be fantastic to see this published in mainstream media, so people can begin to see how much manipulation has been going on to shore up the supremacy of one particular worldview over all others. Brilliant writing!

Expand full comment
Rosemary Hipkins's avatar

Thanks Lynda

As an ex science/human bio teacher I have long thought that we pay far too little attention to the complex systems that drive our own bodies- and especially the brain!

Expand full comment
Winston Moreton's avatar

Excellent analysis. There could be an addendum to the effect that because of skull size construction natural organic brain power is unlikely to grow. The pocket brain (device I'm using now) being produced by the billion by modern privateers is homogeneous

Expand full comment
Mike Friend's avatar

Erica Stanford is the epitome of a person with absolutely no background in education or pedagogy who nonetheless believes that her view on the brain and how it learns is paramount. She is the quintessential ignorant charlatan, who cares nothing for empirical evidence based research findings supporting only that which fits her narrow 'one size fits all' redundant theory of education placed in the trash can many years ago. But hey, she cares not a jot.

Expand full comment
Karen Tui Boyes's avatar

Thanks Lynda - great piece.

Expand full comment